The
following is my latest column in The Jewish Link of New Jersey, in which I assess
how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fared in the context of his recent speech
to a joint meeting of Congress about the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran:
SOUNDING
THE ALARM
By:
N. Aaron Troodler, Esq.
“As far as I can tell, there was
nothing new.” With those ten terse words, President Obama casually and
callously dismissed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to a
joint meeting of Congress.
In an interview after the speech,
the President noted that he did not watch Netanyahu’s address. However, after
stating that he read the transcript of the remarks, he declared that Netanyahu
failed to “offer any viable alternatives” with regard to a possible deal with Iran,
which is intended to address the rogue state’s nuclear program.
The President completely missed the
point. In order for his efforts to be deemed successful, Prime Minister
Netanyahu did not have to come to the United States and propose alternatives to
the deal currently being negotiated between Iran and the P5+1 countries, which
are the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China, and Russia. Netanyahu
was in no way required to lay out a detailed plan on how to best address the
Iranian nuclear threat in order for his remarks to be effective.
All the Prime Minister had to do in
order for his mission to be considered efficacious was raise a red flag,
spotlight the specter of a bad deal, and sound the alarm. Looking at it from
that perspective, Netanyahu’s unquestionably accomplished his goal.
The Prime Minister entered the House
Chamber to a reception that was reminiscent of the incredible ovation that
greets the President when he enters that same majestic room each year to deliver
his State of the Union address. Lawmakers clamored to shake Netanyahu’s hand
and the applause for the Israeli leader was quite vociferous. Despite the
politics that had enveloped Netanyahu’s visit, there was a palpable sense of
excitement and intrigue as he took to the rostrum to deliver his remarks.
And then the Prime Minister did
exactly what he needed to do – he sounded the alarm.
During
his speech, which generated two-dozen standing ovations and frequent sustained
applause, Netanyahu pointed out that we are not dealing with a nation comprised
of boy scouts – we are dealing with Iran. Referring to it as “[t]he foremost
sponsor of global terrorism,” the Prime Minister rightfully reminded the world
of Iran’s past transgressions of terror.
Besides
citing its “goons in Gaza, its lackeys in Lebanon, (and) its revolutionary
guards on the Golan Heights,” Netanyahu recalled the hostage crisis in Tehran,
the murder of American soldiers and Marines in Beirut, and the deadly role Iran
played in the bombing of the Jewish community center and the Israeli embassy in
Argentina.
After
rehashing Iran’s notorious track record of terror, Netanyahu explained why the
deal presently being negotiated is a bad deal. He mentioned two major
concessions that he believes make this deal fundamentally flawed. First, the
deal reportedly would leave Iran’s “vast nuclear infrastructure” intact.
Netanyahu voiced his concern that “[t]housands of centrifuges used to enrich
uranium would be left spinning,” thereby making it fairly simple for Iran to
continue stockpiling enough uranium which could be used to develop a nuclear
bomb in a relatively short period of time. Second, the Prime Minister expressed
his dismay at the fact that the proposed deal purportedly contains a sunset
provision, which provides that the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program will
expire in ten years.
In
addition, the Prime Minister set forth a number of conditions that he believes
Iran must meet prior to having the sanctions eased, independent of its nuclear
program. Netanyahu said that at the very least, Iran should be required to
“stop its aggression against its neighbors in the Middle East,” “stop
supporting terrorism around the world,” and “stop threatening to
annihilate…Israel, the one and only Jewish state.”
With
his historic address to Congress, Prime Minister skillfully and successfully
sounded the alarm. He used what was perhaps the biggest stage available to him
to broadcast the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran and to caution against
entering into “a very bad deal.”
Telling
Congress that the deal could ultimately lead to “a Middle East littered with
nuclear bombs and a countdown to a potential nuclear nightmare,” Netanyahu said
that the proposed agreement “doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb; it paves
Iran’s path to the bomb.”
As
the negotiations with Iran continue and the train hurtles down the track at an extraordinary
rate of speed towards a possible deal, Netanyahu did everything he could to
convince the United States and the world that the train desperately needs to
slow down and reassess the direction in which it is headed.
“The
alternative to this bad deal is a much better deal,” said the Prime Minister.
With
the future of his country at stake and the safety and security of his people at
risk of being compromised even further, the Prime Minister did exactly what he
needed to at this critical juncture. Netanyahu’s speech to Congress was not
about politics, it was about perseverance in the face of tremendous adversity
for the sake of his nation.
Despite
the warm response that Netanyahu’s speech engendered from many members of
Congress, there were certainly those who were not as enamored with his remarks.
House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said after Netanyahu’s address that she “was near
tears throughout the Prime Minister’s speech – saddened by the insult to the
intelligence of the United States as part of the P5 +1 nations, and saddened by
the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our
broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation.”
In
addition to being somewhat puerile, the remarks by the House Minority Leader summed
up what I believe to be the core of the issue. Rep. Pelosi and others apparently
view the Iranian nuclear issue through a lens that is clouded by politics. What
she failed to comprehend is that Prime Minister Netanyahu views this issue
through a lens that is clearly focused on survival.
Israel
and the world cannot afford a deal with Iran that comes about just because some
folks want to be able to say that they reached an accord. A bad deal with Iran
that fails to adequately address the salient points raised by Netanyahu is not
worth the paper that it is written on. Anyone who truly listened to the Prime
Minister’s address and heard him effectively sound the alarm knows that to be
the case.
N. Aaron Troodler is an attorney and principal of Paul
Revere Public Relations, a public relations and political consulting firm.
Visit him on the Web at TroodlersTake.blogspot.com, www.PaulReverePR.com, or
www.JewishWorldPR.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: @troodler
No comments:
Post a Comment