Friday, December 27, 2013

The Prejudice-Promulgating Professors


The following is my latest column in The Jewish Link of Bergen County, in which I take a deeper look at the academic boycott targeting Israel:
 
The Prejudice-Promulgating Professors
 
By: N. Aaron Troodler, Esq.
 
Academics traditionally wear the mantle of freedom of expression with great pride. They embrace the open exchange of ideas and embolden others to engage in independent thinking and knowledge-enhancing exercises. These scholars are generally well-respected and their disciplined pursuit of academic excellence in their respective subject areas is extremely noteworthy.
 
Like most things, however, there is an exception to the rule. Unfortunately, when it comes to professors encouraging freedom of expression in the world of academia, that exception is the State of Israel.
 
In a bizarre deviation from the norm in academic circles, there are a growing number of professors who seem to believe that a double standard is somehow acceptable when it comes to Israel. On one hand, they promote inclusiveness and individuality. On the other hand, they have inexplicably chosen to support an academic boycott of Israel.
 
This movement, which is known as Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (“B.D.S.”), has gotten some traction over the past several years. It gained further momentum when the members of the American Studies Association, a U.S.-based organization that is comprised of university professors, recently voted to endorse the boycott effort.
 
The rationale among supporters of B.D.S is that this movement is a means by which they can protest what they claim to be Israel’s inhumane and inequitable policies towards, and treatment of, the Palestinian Arabs.
 
The audacity and hypocrisy of these professors is incredible. They hold themselves out to be bastions of free expression, yet they have chosen to stifle a country that happens to be the sole democratic nation in the Middle East region, and which has made tremendous inroads in the academic world and great strides in developing innovative ideas and emergent technology. They have taken the extreme measure of condemning the State of Israel over its handling of the Palestinian Arabs, yet they turn a blind eye to the countless acts of terror perpetrated against innocent Israelis by its Arab neighbors.
 
The backers of the B.D.S movement allege human rights violations against Israel and single out the Jewish State, however, they apparently ignore the egregious and blatant human rights violations that are pervasive in other nations around the world.
 
In its 2013 World Report, Human Rights Watch, an organization that monitors and reviews human rights practices throughout the world, outlined a plethora of human rights violations that occurred in 2012.
 
For example, basic rights of freedom of expression and association are routinely restricted by the government in numerous countries, including Ethiopia, Rwanda, Afghanistan, China, North Korea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Turkey, and Egypt.
 
In the Democratic Republic of Congo and Honduras, human rights activists and journalists are threatened, arrested, and killed. In Mali, political upheaval resulted in the displacement of 400,000 residents.  In Uganda, the government’s security force routinely engage in acts of torture. In Colombia, human rights defenders are under constant attack. In Cuba, the government suppresses all political dissent. In Venezuela, opponents of the government are intimidated and prosecuted. In Tajikistan, the government restricts religious expression and education, and domestic violence against women and children is commonplace. In Uzbekistan, torture is widely utilized in the criminal justice system, freedom of expression is limited, and the government sponsors forced child labor. In Iran, executions for various offenses are prevalent. In Iraq, detainees are arbitrarily tortured and peaceful protesters face intimidation and violence. In Syria, tens of thousands of people have been killed as anti-government protests morphed into an all-out armed conflict.
 
The twisted tales of heinous human rights violations that are taking place around the globe are sickening. Yet, remarkably, the professors involved in the B.D.S. movement do not seem too concerned, as they have not taken any steps to initiate boycotts against the countless countries that sanction these crimes against humanity.
 
As self-professed defenders of human rights, the academics’ silence in the face of such overt human rights violations is deafening. In fact, it makes me wonder if their Israeli boycott actually has anything to do with human rights at all.
 
The B.D.S. movement is nothing more than an anti-Israel and anti-Semitic exercise. The professors who enthusiastically support the boycott have shamelessly shed their academic integrity in favor of intolerance and traded in their scholarly books for bigotry.
 
This misguided group of professors is unapologetically promulgating prejudice. Instead of singling out Israel for fallacious human rights infringements, the B.D.S. group should turn its attention to the myriad cases of serious human rights violations that occur on a daily basis around the globe.
 
Stop picking on Israel solely because it is a Jewish State and focus on places and situations that are actually worthy of protestation. My dear professors, your narrow-mindedness is unbecoming, unprofessional, and unpardonable.
 
N. Aaron Troodler is an attorney and a principal of Paul Revere Public Relations, a public relations and political consulting firm. Visit him on the Web at TroodlersTake.blogspot.com, www.PaulReverePR.com, or www.JewishWorldPR.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: @troodler
 

Monday, December 16, 2013

What Merits Top Billing, A Shooting Or The Snow?


The following is an article that I wrote for The Times of Israel blog, in which I examine the New York Times’ coverage of the senseless killing of an Israeli soldier:
 
What Merits Top Billing, A Shooting Or The Snow?
 
By: N. Aaron Troodler, Esq.
 
Jews throughout the world have watched with wonderment as the biggest snowstorm in a half-century blanketed Jerusalem and various cities throughout Israel. We saw numerous photographs and video footage of Israel being transformed into a veritable winter wonderland.
 
At the same time, we are well aware of the crippling effect that this storm has had on Israel. Thousands of people were left without electricity for several days, countless cars were abandoned on the roads due to the heavy snowfall, and main thoroughfares were shut down, impacting travel in and out of Israel’s capital city. Jerusalem, in effect, was under siege from the snow.
 
While I am certainly cognizant of the adverse effect that the snowstorm has clearly had on Israel and the news making event that it undoubtedly is, I have to confess that I was shocked when I read an article in today’s New York Times relating to this virtually unprecedented weather event.
 
The article, which is entitled “Gaza, Vexed by Floods, Gets Fuel and Power,” begins by recounting how Gaza is faring in the aftermath of the storm.
 
Reading the first nine paragraphs of the article, I learned that Gaza’s sole power plant is once again operational after being offline for a month-and-a-half, and that a $10 million grant from Qatar is going to be used to pay for the industrial diesel that is being trucked into Gaza.
 
More than halfway through the article, the writers switch gears and spend three paragraphs discussing the effect that the storm had on Israel, and how Israeli authorities are responding to criticism about their handling of the big snowfall.
 
And then I got to paragraphs 13 and 14 of the article. The final two paragraphs of the story noted that an Israeli soldier was shot and killed last night by a Lebanese soldier as he was on a routine patrol in proximity to the Lebanese border.
 
What bothered me immensely about this is that the article seems to give the impression that reporting on the unprovoked murder of an Israeli soldier was almost an afterthought.
 
The title of the article is related to the snowstorm. The first 500 words of the article are all about the snowstorm. Throughout the first 81% of the article, there is absolutely no mention of the fact that an Israeli soldier was killed.
 
Then the reader arrives at word 501 of a 618 word article and sees, “In a separate development…,” which seemingly gives the impression that this portion of the article was essentially an add-on.
 
Let me be clear about what happened. 31-year Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, a resident of Afula, lost his life when a Lebanese soldier arbitrarily and capriciously decided to open fire at an Israeli army patrol that was traversing Israeli territory, on Israeli soil.
 
Master Sgt. Cohen leaves behind his wife, Ma’ayan, and an infant daughter, whose first birthday is next month. His death is an absolute tragedy, and the fact that his loving wife lost her husband and that his young daughter will now grow up without a father is utterly heartbreaking.
 
Yet, The New York Times did not see fit to dedicate an article, or even a brief, to this horrible tragedy that transpired. Instead, it inexplicably included it as somewhat of an addendum to an article about how Gaza is coping after the snowstorm.
 
I imagine that if the situation was reversed, and an Israeli soldier shot and killed a Lebanese solider for no apparent reason, there would have been a bold headline condemning the attack and an entire article dedicated to how awful it was.
 
Admittedly, the snowstorm that paralyzed Israel is a major news story. However, I personally do not believe that it trumps the terrible tragedy of a young man’s life being cut short simply because he was performing his duties as an Israeli soldier and safeguarding the people of Israel.
 
Let us hope that The New York Times recognizes the error of its ways, and next time, if and when there is a next time, they get it right and give the senseless murder of a brave Israeli soldier the attention that it rightfully deserves.
 

Sunday, December 15, 2013

The Hebrew Humanitarians


The following is my latest column in The Jewish Link of Bergen County, in which I examine a possible antidote to Israel’s PR problems, namely, its altruism and benevolence:
 
THE HEBREW HUMANITARIANS
 
By: N. Aaron Troodler, Esq.
 
There is no denying the fact that the press coverage of Israel by media outlets around the world is often less than flattering. Indeed, Israel is routinely maligned in the media and vilified by those who are theoretically tasked with providing the public with impartial reporting of the news.
 
As a result of this adverse exposure in the press, Israel’s reputation on the world stage is inevitably tarnished. Although it is undeserved and unwarranted, once the negative coverage about Israel hits the newspapers, the damage is done.
 
From a public relations perspective, the Israeli government has its work cut out for itself. They are engaged in a constant struggle to counter the disparaging news stories with positive and informative pieces about all that Israel has to offer and all that it has accomplished. Misstatements in the media are promptly rebutted by Israel, and biased coverage of the Jewish State is generally brought to light.
 
Yet, for all of the negativity that Israel has been forced to endure in the media, there is one issue that has traditionally generated positive press for the Jewish State, and rightfully so.
 
Several weeks ago, in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan, which absolutely devastated the Philippines and resulted in a great loss of life as well as extensive property and infrastructure damage, I watched a wonderful segment on the NBC Nightly News.
 
Dr. Nancy Snyderman, the Chief Medical Editor for NBC News, provided a report from the ravaged nation. What was especially interesting to me was that the focus of her report was Israel.
 
Following the massive storm in the Philippines, the Israeli government did what they always do in the wake of a natural disaster – they sent help.
 
In her report, Dr. Snyderman spoke about how she was in awe of the medical professionals and other personnel from the Israeli Defense Forces who came to the Philippines. She discussed in glowing terms how well the Israelis assist those in need by delivering emergency medical care in exceedingly poor conditions. She noted that the Israeli team chose to set up their sophisticated medical operation in Bogo, a small village that had been hit extremely hard by the storm, yet was off the beaten path and therefore was not necessarily getting as much aid as some of the other areas.
 
This report on NBC was overwhelmingly positive, and Dr. Snyderman spoke about the Israelis in an almost reverential manner. The story enabled the world to get a glimpse of some of the good that emanates from the State of Israel.

When the Israeli team finally left the Philippines, they had provided medical treatment to nearly 3,000 patients and had helped repair a number of damaged buildings, including schools.
In fact, since its founding in 1948, the State of Israel has provided humanitarian aid to more than 140 countries.

Following a powerful earthquake in Turkey in 2011, Israel sent a team to construct temporary structures that were needed in order to assist those who were displaced and injured.

In 2010, an Israeli team traveled to Haiti to provide aid in the aftermath of a powerful earthquake that decimated the small nation. The Israelis set up a temporary hospital and treated countless Haitians who desperately required medical attention.

Israel sent four tons of medical aid to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2008 to assist the refugees there who were suffering greatly.

After Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans in 2005, Israel sent a delegation equipped with 80 tons of food and supplies to help all those who were affected by the storm.

In addition, Israel provided emergency relief aid to Sri Lanka after the 2005 tsunami, to Indonesia after the 2004 tsunami, and to India after the 2001 earthquake. And the list goes on and on.

When tragedy strikes, Israel is always there to answer the call for help. And it is time that the world finally takes notice of Israel’s benevolence and acknowledges its altruistic acts.

While the United Nations never passes up an opportunity to issue baseless condemnations of Israel, the Israeli government never misses a chance to lend a helping hand to some of those very same countries that have denounced her.

Unfortunately, Israel’s public relations problems will not disappear overnight. Those wishing to denigrate the Jewish State will continue to do so.

As such, Israel will keep on employing communications strategies intended to counter the partiality in the press. But one of the best ways that Israel can deflect the daggers that are being thrown at her is to keep doing what she has been doing for so many years, namely, helping people and nations in need. By being the humanitarians that they have proven themselves to be, the Israelis can demonstrate to the world that they are not the villains that their antagonists make them out to be.

N. Aaron Troodler is an attorney and a principal of Paul Revere Public Relations, a public relations and political consulting firm. Visit him on the Web at TroodlersTake.blogspot.com, www.PaulReverePR.com, or www.JewishWorldPR.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: @troodler