Friday, January 19, 2018

No Free Pass For Anti-Semitism

The following is an op-ed that I wrote, which appears in the current edition of The Jewish Press (1/19/18). Entitled “No Free Pass For Anti-Semitism,” it discusses Israel’s latest efforts to combat the BDS movement.

NO FREE PASS FOR ANTI-SEMITISM

By: N. Aaron Troodler

The news that Israel is taking proactive steps to prevent entry by individuals associated with groups that actively advocate for a boycott against the country is not as shocking as the named groups make it out to be.

The boycott championed by BDS activists has significant economic and cultural implications for Israel. It is barefaced anti-Semitism, and therefore warrants a strong and substantial response.

The twenty organizations singled out have only themselves to blame. Their actions fueled this decision by the Israeli government. For any of them to feign surprise and outrage is absurd.

The organizations deliberately turn a blind eye to the fact that it is the Palestinians themselves – not the Israeli government – who have the ability to extricate themselves from the current situation, which their leaders and some compatriots created.

Painting Israel as the aggressor is incongruous with reality, and implying that Israel wantonly subjugates another ethnic group and stifles human rights is farcical. Israel’s actions to safeguard its citizens are necessary responses to overt threats of violence, heinous acts of terror, indiscriminate rocket attacks, and blatant incitement. Contrary to the misguided assertions of the BDS activists, self-defense cannot and should not be categorized as some sort of oppression.

The list of organizations affected by the travel ban includes six American-based groups; namely, American Friends Service Committee, American Muslims for Palestine, Code Pink, Jewish Voice for Peace, National Students for Justice in Palestine, and US Campaign for Palestinian Rights.

What’s particularly striking is that American Friends Services Committee (AFSC), a century-old Quaker organization that purports to “promote lasting peace with justice,” was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1947 for its efforts to assist Jews who were persecuted by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

In his presentation speech on December 10, 1947 at the University of Oslo, Nobel Committee Chairman Gunner Jahn noted that although World War II did not strike the Quakers personally, they undertook relief work and aided the refugees, despite the fact that countries occupied by the Nazis were closed to the Quakers.

In a statement issued by AFSC in response to its inclusion on Israel’s list, Joyce Ajlouny, the group’s general secretary, invoked its Nobel Prize win, noted that her group has “stood with communities facing oppression and violence around the world,” and then proceeded to make a series of troubling remarks.

“All people, including Palestinians, have a right to live in safety and peace and have their human rights respected,” she said. “For 51 years, Israel has denied Palestinians in the occupied territories their fundamental human rights, in defiance of international law…. The ban on entry to Israel for activists who support the Palestinian-led BDS movement is part of a larger effort by the Israeli government to silence and constrain human rights and anti-occupation activists…. Therefore, as long as these and other human rights violations persist, we will continue to support Palestinian-led boycott, divestment, and sanctions efforts as effective nonviolent tools for realizing political and social change.”

Clearly, AFSC’s efforts relative to the Jews during World War II are notable and laudable. At a time when most of the world turned its back on the Jews in their time of need, this organization did not.

That being said, its magnanimous actions during the Holocaust do not entitle AFSC to a free pass for its current anti-Israel activities. Its efforts more than seventy years ago are certainly admirable but it in no way provide license to boycott Israel today.

AFSC’s actions and those of the other BDS activists are unequivocally anti-Semitic, and for them to not understand that speaks volumes about their true intentions regarding Israel.

Have they ever contemplated why Israel was forced to impose certain security-related measures that impact the Palestinians? Have they ever considered that if the Palestinians took the very basic steps of acknowledging Israel’s right to exist and condemning terrorism, the situation would be vastly different? Have they ever pondered the fact that Israelis also “have a right to live in safety and peace”?

When Israel takes measures to combat BDS, it is not repressing people’s rights, as BDS proponents allege. It is simply taking the necessary and appropriate steps to protect itself against an anti-Semitic and anti-Israel effort of epic proportions.

When he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of AFSC in December 1947, Professor Henry J. Cadbury declared that “the common people of all nations want peace.”

Unfortunately, that statement is not entirely accurate in today’s world. Israelis definitely want peace and long for a time when they can live their lives without having to look over their shoulder to see if a terrorist with a knife or a martyr with a bomb strapped to his chest is lurking in the shadows.

The question the people at the American Friends Services Committee and other BDS activists should be asking themselves is, do the Palestinians genuinely want peace? Until the Palestinians prove otherwise, it appears the answer is “no.”

N. Aaron Troodler is a communications professional with experience in government, politics, issue advocacy, and the Jewish non-profit world. Follow him on Twitter: @troodler

Thursday, January 11, 2018

My 9 letters in The New York Times

Here are my nine letters to the editor that have been printed in The New York Times over the years:

Letter #1:

Teaneck's True Beauty

Published: February 25, 2007

To the Editor:

''Proudly Diverse Teaneck Is Forced to Re-examine Its Assumptions,'' by Peter Applebome (Our Towns column, Feb. 18), insinuates that there are ethnic tensions percolating beneath the surface in Teaneck, N.J.

Highlighting the township's recent local election and implying that one particular group is attempting to become a dominant political force is a dangerously divisive approach. The hallmark of democracy is the freedom to choose. Every person has the ability to cast his vote for the candidate of his choice.

I, for one, chose to vote for the candidates who I believed would best represent not only my interests, but also the interests of all Teaneck residents. Teaneck's true beauty is its uniquely diverse composition and the ability of people to coexist irrespective of their race or religion.

We should focus not on what makes us different from one another, but on what unites us and brings us closer together as a community.

Nachman A. Troodler
Teaneck, N.J., Feb. 20, 2007

----

Letter #2:

America’s Relationship With Israel

FEB. 11, 2011

To the Editor:

Daniel Gordis sheds some much-needed light on what could perhaps be construed as a dark time for Israel. With the political turmoil in Egypt creating an uncertain future in the Middle East and the threat of Islamic fundamentalist rule looming large, the prospect of creating a sense of stability in the region at this critical juncture cannot be overlooked.

Rather than risk alienating its sole democratic ally in the region when it needs Israel most, America should reassess its position toward Israel when establishing preconditions to peace talks.

Instead of placing the onus mainly on Israel and urging it to accede to certain demands as a prerequisite to renewed peace talks, the United States must insist that the Palestinians demonstrate a show of good faith before moving forward. Addressing the Palestinians’ steadfast refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state is a good place to start.

N. Aaron Troodler
Teaneck, N.J., Feb. 9, 2011

----

Letter #3:

Orthodox in Israeli Army

JULY 14, 2013

To the Editor:

As an Orthodox Jew, I am acutely aware of the ideological and theological debate regarding the prospect of members of Israel’s ultra-Orthodox community being enlisted into mandatory service in the Israel Defense Forces (“Service Brings Scorn to Israel’s Ultra-Orthodox Enlistees,” news article, July 7).

While I understand the divergent views on this controversial subject, I find it absolutely appalling that Israeli nationals, regardless of their position on the religious spectrum, would engage in conduct that is intended to denigrate and demean those brave people who have already chosen to serve their country and put their lives on the line to defend Israel’s borders and safeguard its citizens.

We can agree to disagree, but the people who have chosen to protect you deserve your gratitude, not scorn.

N. AARON TROODLER
Teaneck, N.J., July 7, 2013

----

Letter #4:

The Rising Tide of Anti-Semitism

AUG. 25, 2014

To the Editor:

Re “Why Jews Are Worried” (Op-Ed, Aug. 21):

Deborah E. Lipstadt did an admirable job noting the distinctions between the anti-Semitism of the Nazi era in the 1930s and the increased level of anti-Semitism we are witnessing today.

Although the impetus for the various anti-Semitic acts may be distinct from one another, the common denominator is that they are all fueled by an innate sense of animosity toward one particular religious group. That hatred is compounded by the fact that anti-Semitism is becoming not just acceptable (to some) but also quite routine.

This brazen assault on freedom of religion is particularly troubling and runs counter to the democratic ideals of a civilized society. The recent uptick in anti-Semitism is akin to a conflagration that is becoming increasingly difficult to extinguish.

As Jews, we do not always need to press the panic button, but we must sound the alarm so the international community takes heed of the acute nature of this growing and disturbing problem.

N. AARON TROODLER
Teaneck, N.J., Aug. 21, 2014

----

Letter #5:

The Vatican Recognizes Palestine

MAY 19, 2015

To the Editor:

The determination by the Vatican to confer a degree of international legitimacy on the Palestinian Authority by recognizing a Palestinian state, while it has no tangible effect, is troubling nonetheless.

Pope Francis has made tremendous strides during his papal tenure in enhancing the relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jews, which makes the Vatican’s pronouncement about embracing a Palestinian state extraordinarily perplexing.

The enigmatic decision of the pope, who is a true champion of human rights throughout the world, to overlook the failings of the Palestinian Authority, which include condoning terrorism by giving stipends and grants to terrorists in or released from Israeli jails, is antithetical to the causes and ideals that he has consistently advocated.

Before endorsing a Palestinian state, Pope Francis should have encouraged the Palestinians to eschew their ties to terrorism and demonstrate that they are committed to achieving a peaceful resolution to their dispute with Israel.

N. AARON TROODLER

Teaneck, N.J.

----

Letter #6:

The Israeli-Palestinian Tumult: Clashing Perspectives

OCT. 15, 2015

To the Editor:

“Young Palestinians Fanning the Flames of a New Uprising” (front page, Oct. 14) does an exceptional job spotlighting the young Palestinians who have committed numerous acts of terror against Israelis over the last several weeks.

While social media certainly plays a pivotal part in inspiring the perpetrators to resort to violence, you rightly note the deadly role that incitement plays in this tragic tale of terror. By glorifying terrorism and celebrating martyrdom, the leaders in these communities essentially sanction the violence and lead these young people down a divisive and dangerous path.

Teaching an entire generation of Palestinian youths to loathe their Israeli neighbors has proved to be a deadly practice, the reverberations of which are felt every time another life is lost. Those who encourage and endorse terrorism are as culpable as the people who carry out the terrorist acts.

Before an already tenuous situation spirals further out of control, steps must be taken to curb the violence and end the incitement. This deadly tsunami of terror is not going to recede on its own.

N. AARON TROODLER

Bala Cynwyd, Pa.

----

Letter #7:

Your Thoughts on Trump’s V.P.

July 3, 2016

As he tries to shed the labels that have beleaguered him on the campaign trail, such as “inexperienced,” “misogynistic,” and “egotistic,” Donald Trump desperately needs a running mate who will help him overcome his perceived shortcomings. Mary Fallin, the charismatic governor of Oklahoma, who served four years in Congress, would be the perfect equalizer. She would bring gender and geographic balance and significant governmental experience to the G.O.P. ticket. While she has Capitol Hill know-how, Governor Fallin isn’t considered a “Washington insider.” She would be a compelling V.P. choice.

N. AARON TROODLER, Bala Cynwyd, Pa.

----

Letter #8:

When Racism Comes Out in the Open

November 23, 2016

To the Editor:

Re “Alt-Right, Exulting in Election, Salutes Winner: ‘Heil Victory’ ” (front page, Nov. 21):

The alt-right’s recent conference in Washington is a sad and stark reminder that racism is alive and well in America.

The unabashed denigration of Jews, African-Americans, immigrants and other minorities by the alt-right is a means by which it can peddle and propagandize the prejudice and hatred that have kept it on the fringe for much of its existence. President-elect Donald Trump’s victory should not and cannot give license to racism, and the alt-right’s use of his electoral win to come out of the shadows and feel emboldened is appalling and frightening.

At a time when our nation desperately needs to come together and bridge the divide, hate-mongering by the alt-right counteracts the healing.

The alt-right’s impudence in opposing the tenets of our democratic society in an open forum should serve as a cause for alarm for every American who values equality and social justice.

N. AARON TROODLER

Bala Cynwyd, Pa.

----

Letter #9:

Feuding With McConnell

August 24, 2017

To the Editor:

Re “President’s Feud With McConnell Becomes Hostile” (front page, Aug. 23): The deterioration of the relationship between President Trump and Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, should concern every American.

The rancor between them is not merely political theater or a trivial battle for supremacy; rather, it is detrimental to the American system of governance. This extraordinary intraparty conflict virtually ensures that government gridlock will reign for the foreseeable future.

The Trump-McConnell feud is a microcosm of a broader issue that has become pervasive in our nation. We cannot allow the acrimony and dissonance that have regrettably become commonplace in America to become an acceptable norm. Civility, not further conflict, can begin helping our nation heal.

After the events in Charlottesville, Va., what we need is more dialogue and less discord. We need to come together, not tear ourselves further apart.

N. AARON TROODLER
BALA CYNWYD, PA.

My 4 letters in Sports Illustrated

As I was going through some old files, I came across my four letters to the editor that have been printed in Sports Illustrated over the years. Here they are:

Letter #1:

August 7, 2006

Your cover photo of the five Mets signifies everything that is right with baseball. These talented yet grounded players exude confidence, optimism and a love of the game. Their smiles light up a sport that desperately needs to emerge from the shadow of a steroids scandal.

Aaron Troodler, Teaneck, N.J.

----

Letter #2: 

August 15, 2011

Posnanski did a masterly job encapsulating the soul and spirit of a game that has created countless memories for Americans young and old (Loving Baseball, July 25). Although baseball is often referred to as the national pastime, that term is something of a misnomer, as the sport is not merely a thing of the past; it is an integral part of the present, and it will undoubtedly play a central role in the American landscape for the foreseeable future.

Aaron Troodler, Teaneck, N.J.

----

Letter #3:

August 20, 2012

I want to thank L. Jon Wertheim for his informative and insightful perspective on the challenges Israeli athletes face in international competition (Never Forgotten). Rather than worrying about offending Arab nations whose athletes refuse to compete against Israeli teams, the IOC should have done everything possible to properly pay tribute to the Israeli Olympians who were brutally murdered at the Munich Games.

Aaron Troodler, Teaneck, N.J.

----

Letter #4:

January 16, 2017

Tim Layden’s profile of Michael Phelps reveals the essence of a champion (The Gold Standard). In addition to achieving unparalleled Olympic success, Phelps showed tremendous courage by seeking help to regain control of his life. When it comes to talent and tenacity, he is undoubtedly worth his weight in gold.

N. Aaron Troodler
Bala Cynwyd, Pa.

Thursday, January 4, 2018

The Intersection of Politics and Prejudice


The following is my latest piece on The Times of Israel blog, which is entitled “The Intersection of Politics and Prejudice.” It’s about the emergence of the alt-right in American politics and the danger that this hate-based group poses to the American Jewish community.

THE INTERSECTION OF POLITICS AND PREJUDICE

By: N. Aaron Troodler

America’s political sphere has become exceedingly complex, with the 2016 presidential election thrusting the growing divide between the “right” and the “left” into the forefront. Candidates presented themselves as defenders of the “right” or champions of the “left,” and each party’s fringe elements galvanized their supporters to protest their party’s purported out-of-touch ideologies.

In Congress, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which advocates for particularly liberal positions, and the House Freedom Caucus, which promotes ultra-conservative policies, are impacting the legislative process in newfangled ways.

The offshoot of these zealous political alliances presented opportunities for radical groups to emerge from the woodwork and transition from the periphery to the mainstream, thereby crippling our nation and paralyzing our political process.

Our nation was awakened from its relative slumber in August 2017 after a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia turned deadly. Several dozen people were injured and three people died, one of whom was killed after a white nationalist intentionally drove his car into a crowd of counter-protestors and struck her.

The violence that enveloped the rally on that fateful day was a symbol of where our nation is headed. Whereas civil disobedience and civil discourse have always been central to the American political scene, the events in Charlottesville demonstrated how profound hatred and hostility have filtered into the American mainstream.

This newfound rancor stems from a group commonly labeled the “alt-right.” A creation of white supremacist Richard Spencer and other likeminded individuals, this movement is predicated upon the notion that conventional political conservatives are not conservative enough. The alt-right eschews multiculturalism and espouses racism to bolster its stance that white supremacy is sacrosanct.

Along with the racist undertones that comprise the alt-right’s political blueprint is the blatant anti-Semitism it regularly exercises. The alt-right’s leaders make no secret about their dislike for Jews and they proudly permit anti-Semites to address their members. When it comes to the alt-right, Jews are Public Enemy No. 1.

The anti-Semitism emanating from the alt-right underscores a systemic problem that is escalating at a frenetic and frightening pace.

The fact that people believe it is acceptable to demonize any religious or ethnic group is alarming. The alt right has unabashedly taken our country’s political divisions and manipulated them to create a colossal chasm between their constituency and Jews, African-Americans, and other minority groups. They actively seek to perpetuate people’s prejudicial propensities and prey upon biases that are deeply rooted in bigotry in order to further their skewed political agenda whose very foundation is religious and racial intolerance.

With anti-Semitic hate crimes on the rise in the United States, we cannot permit the alt-right to peddle their prejudicial propaganda in the mainstream of American culture. Making it acceptable to denigrate individuals based on their religious beliefs is contemptable and completely unacceptable. The methods and message of the alt-right are absolutely wrong.

As Jews in some European countries fear for their safety amidst the rise of extremist political parties and a rash of violent hate crimes, one cannot help but wonder how it came to this. How is it that just seven decades after the Nazis murdered six-million Jews, anti-Semitism has once again reared its ugly head in the shadow of the very death camps that bore witness to mass extermination during the Holocaust? What happened to “Never Again?”

While American Jewry debates the severity of the anti-Semitism encompassing Europe, we cannot forget that a similar anti-Semitic storm is brewing on American soil.

The emerging dangers of the alt-right and the detrimental impact that this emboldened group is having on American culture is palpable. The alt-right is tearing away at the fabric of our nation and eroding the democratic foundation upon which this nation is built. We are becoming immune to this effort to divide our country, and we cannot stand idly by and let it happen.

Our founding fathers built this nation on the premise that the exchange of differing political views would lead to a vibrant and vigorous republic, where open debate was welcomed and the free exchange of ideas was celebrated. The emergent battle between the “right” and the “left” is consistent with our founding fathers’ vision. Although the dialogue is occasionally unpleasant and uncivil, the fact is that the passionate advocacy embraced by the various political groups is part of democracy.

Nevertheless, when it comes to politics and activism, there is a line that should not be crossed. The hatred and bigotry cultivated by the alt-right unquestionably crosses that line.

The alt-right is not about politics; it is about prejudice. The divisiveness and discord that this hate-based group disseminates is downright dangerous. Building a movement whose very basis is bigotry is antithetical to our founding fathers’ grand vision. If we allow the alt-right to continue fostering anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and stigmatization of minorities, then we too are complicit in furthering their racist agenda.

“Never Again” means not today, not tomorrow, not ever. It means we must recognize a threat to our Jewish identity and be vocal and united in our opposition to that peril. It means we have to challenge intolerance when it manifests itself and fight back against all forms of racism. “Never Again” means we must combat the anti-Semitism being promulgated by the alt-right and send a clear message to the world that Jews refuse to be bullied by bigots.

“Never Again” is a rallying cry for the preservation of the Jewish people when we are challenged by the alt-right or any hate group. In the face of adversity and animosity, strict adherence to the doctrine of “Never Again” can and will help ensure the Jewish future.

The alt-right’s brand of white identity politics and barefaced anti-Semitism crosses the proverbial political line. It is at watershed moments like this that American Jewry has to proclaim with fervor and urgency, “Never Again.”